Fitch on Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation’s Performance

[Editor: This is the text of an announcement from Fitch Ratings.]

Fitch: Grand Parkway Performance a Positive Sign for Toll Road Projects

Fitch Ratings-Chicago-24 January 2017: The Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation (GPTC), which issued $2.9 billion of toll revenue bonds in 2013 to finance the design and construction of major sections of a third ring road around Houston, TX, is well on track to meet expectations relative to its original finance plan, according to Fitch Ratings.

The system reached substantial completion on March 29, 2016, approximately six months behind the original schedule, but within budget. Full system traffic and revenue levels through eight months of operation indicate that the first full year will be substantially greater relative to the original forecast at financial close. In addition, with the completion of construction, the GPTC was able to make its planned draw on the TIFIA loan and pay off the subordinate series 2014A bond anticipation notes (BANs) at maturity as well as the subordinate series 2014C bonds.

Greenfield toll roads globally have historically struggled to meet projections. Importantly, recent experience for traditional toll roads has been a departure from these long-term trends with North Carolina Turnpike (Triangle Expressway), Central Texas Turnpike System, and the Grand Parkway at or close to original projections. This experience has extended to the more unproven area of managed lanes where a number of facilities have opened in the past two years and most have performed closer to initial forecasted projections. It is too early to call this a meaningful shift in the standards and quality of forecasts as there are projects like SH130 near Austin, Texas that have severely underperformed; however, it does indicate that greater conservatism is being incorporated to address opening year and facility ramp up risks. Only success on new projects over a period of a decade or more will provide greater confidence that forecasting techniques and input assumptions are more reliable and that this performance may in fact be sustainable.

The portion of Grand Parkway’s segment D in Harris County and the entirety of segment E opened in December 2013 with tolling commencing Feb. 1, 2014. Segments F-1 and F-2 followed, opening on Feb. 5, 2016, with tolling beginning February 15. Segment G was the last to be completed on March 29, 2016 with tolling commencing April 4, 2016. Substantial completion of March 29, 2016 was an approximately six-month lag from the original Oct. 3, 2015 date due to adverse and unexpected weather conditions in the Houston area. Importantly, however, the project was completed on budget and the delay was still within the capitalized interest period and did not impact the financial profile.

Traffic on Grand Parkway has outperformed not only the Fitch base case, but also the sponsor’s forecast since opening. Through May 2016, transactions exceeded forecast by a total of 42%, and this trend has continued. For the period April through November 2016 (representing the months for which the entire system was open and tolled), transactions averaged 182% of the original forecast. Given that the majority of the system opened in 2016, a full year’s operating history is not yet available. In addition, the system remains in ramp-up, with approximately 25% growth for segments D and E in 2015 over 2014.

Consistent with Fitch Rating’s expectation, the GPTC requisitioned $841 million (the maximum amount allowable under its TIFIA loan agreement) from the U.S. DOT on Dec. 13, 2016. The funds were disbursed and the proceeds were used to pay off the GPTC’s $733 million subordinate tier toll revenue series 2014A BANs and its $107 million subordinate tier toll revenue refunding bonds, series 2014C (TELA supported). This takes advantage of the low cost of borrowing with a fixed interest rate of 3.65% and flexible amortization profile with a scheduled final maturity of fiscal 2051. While Fitch recognized there were a number of conditions precedent that had to be satisfied before the TIFIA loan could be disbursed to redeem the subordinate toll revenue BANs, the majority of the conditions were administrative. However, under the events of default, including a development default, TIFIA disbursements may have been withheld. Risks to the development default were largely mitigated by an investment grade developer, adequate completion security package, and Fitch’s completion risk analysis. To the extent that any of the conditions precedent to disburse the TIFIA loan were not met, the GPTC could have been exposed to market access and potentially higher borrowing costs.

In addition, the GPTC refunded $84 million of subordinate series 2014B bonds (TELA supported) with series 2016 refunding bonds (TELA supported) maturing in 2023 and that bear an interest rate of 2.20%. This creates annual debt service savings from the 5% previously assumed through 2023, at which point the bonds are anticipated to be refunded again with a variable rate put bond that will have a final maturity of fiscal 2044. This debt represents a very small fraction of the GPTC’s total debt creating only minimal refinance risk. It is presumed to be amortized subsequently at an assumed 5% rate through 2044.

The GPTC maintains a total of approximately $2.9 billion of toll revenue obligations outstanding ($200 million first tier bonds, $841 million second tier TIFIA loan, and $1.9 billion of TELA supported subordinate tier). Fitch currently rates both the first and second tier obligations the same at ‘BBB+’/Stable Outlook, given the TIFIA loan’s ability to spring to parity with first tier debt in a bankruptcy related event. Fitch currently rates $1.8 billion of subordinate tier revenue bonds higher at ‘AA-‘/Stable Outlook given the TELA support provided by TxDOT. The GPTC will remain in a partial capitalized interest period in fiscal 2017, with a full year of debt service becoming due beginning in fiscal 2018.

The GPTC is undertaking to develop additional Segments H and I through a Design-Build contract and to finance the project through the use of Grand Parkway system toll revenue obligations. The GPTC estimates the H&I capital costs at approximately $1.25 billion and to take around five years to construct. Fitch’s analysis incorporates the risk associated with any related additional borrowing.

Contact:

Jeffrey Lack
Director
+1 312 368-3171
Fitch Ratings, Inc., 70 W. Madison St., Chicago, IL 60602

Adam Torres
Director
+1 212 908 0515

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212-908-0278, Email: sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.
ENDORSEMENT POLICY – Fitch’s approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory Disclosures page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.